The agency’s director, Bob Abbey, said the new plan was intended to ensure that viable herds of wild horses and burros remain on the nation’s public lands for generations to come. To improve the health of both horses and Western lands, officials need the help of private partners and must ensure that management decisions have a scientific foundation, Abbey said.
The changes do not include a proposal that Abbey and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar floated in late 2009 to move thousands of wild horses to preserves in the Midwest and East, where they would graze on land unthreatened by drought and wildfires. The government would have established large horse ranches open to the public for tours and educational visits. The preserves would have cost at least $92 million to buy and build. The plan ran into bipartisan opposition in Congress and among the public.
“It was very evident to us that the public did not like that idea, and so we have dropped that from the strategy we are pursuing now,” Abbey told reporters in a conference call.
The new approach comes a week after the House approved an amendment to cut the agency’s budget by $2 million to protest the roundups. The program’s annual cost has tripled over the last decade to
$66 million. Annual costs are expected to reach at least
$85 million by 2012.
More than 38,000 wild horses and burros roam in Nevada, Colorado, Wyoming and other Western states, the Bureau of Land Management says. An additional 40,000 animals are cared for in corrals and pastures in Kansas, Oklahoma and South Dakota, it says.
The Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act was passed by Congress in 1971. It is intended to protect wild horse herds and the rangelands that support them. Under the program, thousands of horses are forced into holding pens, where many are vaccinated or gelded before being placed for adoption or sent to long-term holding facilities in the Midwest.
Animal-rights advocates complain that the roundups – which include the use of helicopters – are inhumane because some animals are traumatized, injured or killed.
Ranchers and other groups say the roundups are needed to protect fragile grazing lands that are used by cattle, bighorn sheep and other wildlife.
Abbey said he knows the changes will not end controversy over the horse management program but said they send an important message: “We will no longer kick the can down the road just because it is challenging.”
Wayne Pacelle, president of the Humane Society of the United States, called the latest plan encouraging but said the Obama administration needs to do more to reduce the number of horses rounded up and removed from public lands.
The current plan “is not economically sustainable, and it is bad policy,” Pacelle said.
BLM is inhumane!!
Many people believe that … But what about the BLM people who work long hours – often unknown to the majority of the public – to manage their herds well, using and/or implementing fertility control programs to reduce roundups and removals? Believe me, they seldom get credit for the good they do. As in all groups, organizations, agencies – especially sprawling government ones – there are “good” and … “not so good.” Please keep in mind the individual people within BLM … and don’t paint them all with the same broad brush.
I keep wondering if they’ll PZP more mares this year (or whenever the new program starts) to make up for removing fewer.
I imagine it depends on timing and the EAs that have been conducted or are in the process (as ours is) ahead of the scheduled roundups. We’ve been working toward this goal since the end of 2007, and we still don’t know. You can be sure that I’ll announce it as soon as I know whether we’ll be on that list … and/or the alternative.